White v. Dayton, 91 Ohio St.3d 201 (2001)

Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Summary


Appellate procedure - Final order - Political subdivision tort liability - R.C. 2744.02(C) - Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman.

Summary


Appellate procedure - Final order - Political subdivision tort liability - R.C. 2744.02(C) - Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman.

Text




[Cite as White v. Dayton, 91 Ohio St.3d 201, 2001-Ohio-253.]

WHITE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, ET AL.

[Cite as White v. Dayton (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 201.]

Appellate procedure -- Final order -- Political subdivision tort liability -- R.C. 2744.02(C) -- Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (Nos. 00-553 and 00-554 -- Submitted February 28, 2001 -- Decided March 28, 2001.)

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 17714.

____________________

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, ___ N.E.2d ___.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

____________________

Jeffrey R. McQuiston, Richard S. Skelton and Richard D. Donenfeld, for appellees.

J. Rita McNeil, Director of Law; Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Neil F. Freund and Lynnette Pisone Ballato, for appellant.

- 1 -

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company