Toledo v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 1211 (2002)
Linked as:
Summary
Appeal dismissed as moot.
Summary
Appeal dismissed as moot.
Text
[Cite as Toledo v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-5780.]
CITY OF TOLEDO, APPELLANT, v. ROSS, APPELLEE.
[Cite as Toledo v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-5780.]
Appeal dismissed as moot.
(No. 2001-1815 -- Submitted September 18, 2002 -- Decided November 6, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, Nos. L-00-1337, L-00- 1338, L-00-1339, L-00-1340, L-00-1341 and L-00-1342.
____________________
The appeal is dismissed as moot.
MOYER, C.J., GRENDELL, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, J., dissents.
DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J.
____________________
Barbara E. Herring, Director of Law, John T. Madigan, General Counsel, and Lora L. Manon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Shindler, Neff, Holmes & Schlageter, L.L.P., and Richard L. Emery; Wise & Dorner, Ltd., and Bernadette Restivo Noe, for appellee.
Barry M. Byron, Stephen L. Byron and John Gotherman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Municipal League.
____________________
- 1 -
Sponsored links
