State v. Tate, 106 Ohio St.3d 455 (2005)
Linked as:
Summary
Criminal law — R.C. 2911.02 — Robbery — Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Thomas and cause remanded.
Summary
Criminal law — R.C. 2911.02 — Robbery — Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Thomas and cause remanded.
Text
[Cite as State v. Tate, 106 Ohio St.3d 455, 2005-Ohio-5511.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TATE, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Tate, 106 Ohio St.3d 455, 2005-Ohio-5511.]
Criminal law -- R.C. 2911.02 -- Robbery -- Court of appeals' judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Thomas and cause remanded.
(No. 2004-0963 -- Submitted September 21, 2005 -- Decided November 2, 2005.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 82871, 2004-Ohio-2007.
____________________
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thomas, 106 Ohio St.3d 133, 2005-Ohio-4106, 832 N.E.2d 1190, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of State v. Thomas.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
____________________
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary McGrath, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
____________________
- 1 -
Sponsored links
