State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 544 (2007)
Linked as:
Summary
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
Summary
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
Text
[Cite as State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 544, 2007-Ohio-804.]
THE STATE EX REL. TUSSING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 544, 2007-Ohio-804.]
Workers' compensation -- Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.
(No. 2006-0651 -- Submitted January 23, 2007 -- Decided March 14, 2007.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 05AP-178, 2006-Ohio-703.
____________________
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, grant the writ, and return the cause to the Industrial Commission.
____________________
Philip J. Fulton Law Office and Jacob Dobres, for appellant.
Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Derrick L. Knapp, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
____________________
- 1 -
Sponsored links
