Rose v. Bowling Green State Univ., (Ohio 2003)
Linked as:
Summary
Magistrate’s 3-17-2003 judgment rendered in favor of defendant adopted.
Summary
Magistrate’s 3-17-2003 judgment rendered in favor of defendant adopted.
Text
[Cite as Rose v. Bowling Green State Univ., 2003-Ohio-1283.]
IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
JEROME ROSE :
Plaintiff : CASE NO. 2001-04077
v. : JUDGMENT ENTRY
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY : Judge Fred J. Shoemaker
Defendant :
____________________
This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On January 31, 2003, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.
Civ.R. 53 states: "Within 14 days of the filing of a magistrate's decision, a party may file written objections to the magistrate's decision." Plaintiff timely filed his objections.
In plaintiff's objections, plaintiff argues that the decision of the magistrate is against the manifest weight of the evidence. However, upon an independent review of the record, the transcript of proceedings, the exhibits admitted into evidence, and the magistrate's decision, the court finds that the magistrate correctly found the relevant facts, analyzed the issues and applied the law to the facts. Therefore, the objections are OVERRULED and the court adopts the magistrate's decision and recommendation as its own. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all
- 1 -
Case No. 2001-04077
JUDGMENT ENTRY
parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
____________________
FRED J. SHOEMAKER Judge Entry cc: Harland M. Britz Attorney for Plaintiff 416 North Erie Street, Suite 100 Toledo, Ohio 43624-2399 Randall W. Knutti Attorney for Defendant Assistant Attorney General 65 East State St., 16th Fl. Columbus, Ohio 43215 LP/cmd Filed 32003 Jr. Vol. 736, Pgs. 84-85 To S.C. reporter
- 2 -
Sponsored links
