Koller v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., (Ohio 2011)

Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Summary


Magistrate's November 18, 2011 recommendation adopted. Judgment rendered in favor of defendant.

Summary


Magistrate's November 18, 2011 recommendation adopted. Judgment rendered in favor of defendant.

Text




[Cite as Koller v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-6866.]

    Court of Claims of Ohio  The Ohio Judicial Center   65 South Front Street, Third Floor  Columbus, OH 43215  614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263  www.cco.state.oh.us      KEVIN  KOLLER,       Case  No.  2010-08110              Plaintiff,            Judge Joseph T. Clark                  Magistrate Matthew C. Rambo              v.    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF   REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION,              Defendant.            JUDGMENT ENTRY    {¶1} This case is sua sponte assigned to Judge Joseph T. Clark to conduct all  proceedings necessary for decision in this matter.  {¶2} On November 18, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending  judgment for defendant.  {¶3} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part:  “A party may file written objections to a  magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the  court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R.  53(D)(4)(e)(i).”  {¶4} Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i) provides: “The court may enter a judgment either during  the fourteen days permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) for the filing of objections to a  magistrate’s decision or after the fourteen days have expired.  If the court enters a  judgment during the fourteen days permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) for the filing of  objections, the timely filing of objections to the magistrate’s decision shall operate as an  automatic stay of execution of the judgment until the court disposes of those objections  and vacates, modifies, or adheres to the judgment previously entered.”     {¶5} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on  the face of the magistrate’s decision.  Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s 

- 1 -

Case No. 2010-08110  - 2 -  ENTRY   decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of  law contained therein.  Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant.  Court costs are  assessed against plaintiff.  The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment  and its date of entry upon the journal.               

____________________

        JOSEPH  T.  CLARK        Judge        cc:        James P. Dinsmore  Kevin Koller, #522-019  Assistant Attorney General  Mansfield Correctional Institution  150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor  P.O. Box 788  Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130  Mansfield, Ohio 44901-0788        Filed November 18, 2011  To S.C. reporter December 30, 2011   

- 2 -

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company