Hutton v. Ohio State Penitentiary, (Ohio 2011)

Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Summary


Failure to pay for agreed upon repairs to plaintiff’s typewriter. Admission of damages and liability. Judgment for plaintiff.

Summary


Failure to pay for agreed upon repairs to plaintiff’s typewriter. Admission of damages and liability. Judgment for plaintiff.

Text




 



[Cite as Hutton v. Ohio State Penitentiary, 2011-Ohio-3854.]

    Court of Claims of Ohio  The Ohio Judicial Center   65 South Front Street, Third Floor  Columbus, OH 43215  614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263  www.cco.state.oh.us        PERCY HUTTON              Plaintiff              v.    OHIO STATE PENITENTIARY              Defendant          Case No. 2010-10670-AD    Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert    MEMORANDUM DECISION    FINDINGS OF FACT  {¶ 1} Plaintiff, Percy Hutton, an inmate incarcerated at defendant’s Ohio State  Penitentiary (OSP), filed this action alleging that his personal typewriter required  maintenance and repairs as a result of using the typewriter during his work assignment  at OSP.  Plaintiff asserts the warden and deputy warden at OSP agreed to pay for the  necessary repairs.  According to plaintiff, the typewriter was sent to a service center for  repairs and after several weeks, plaintiff was notified that the bill for service had not yet  been paid.  Plaintiff relates that on November 17, 2009, he received a release of claim  form from OSP purporting to pay $92.72, the stated repair expense.  The form noted  that the money would be deposited by OSP into plaintiff’s inmate account. However,  plaintiff claims that any monies placed in his account will be confiscated pursuant to a  court order and he will not have use of the funds in order to secure the release of his  typewriter from the service center.  In his complaint, plaintiff requested damages in the  amount of $92.72.  Payment of the filing fee was waived.   {¶ 2} Defendant submitted an investigation report admitting liability and 

- 1 -

  acknowledging that plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $92.72.  {¶ 3}  Plaintiff filed a response suggesting defendant agreed to pay for the  typewriter repairs and that he had not refused to accept payment.  Rather, plaintiff  seeks to have the money sent directly to the repair facility in that any monies placed in  his inmate account are subject to forfeiture.  Thus, plaintiff seeks an order from the court  prohibiting defendant from using any monies awarded as reimbursement for outstanding  court costs.   CONCLUSIONS OF LAW  {¶ 4} The credibility of witnesses and the weight attributable to their testimony are  primarily matters for the trier of fact. State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 230, 39  O.O. 2d 366, 227 N.E. 2d 212, paragraph one of the syllabus. The court is free to  believe or disbelieve,  all or any part of each witness's testimony. State v. Antill (1964),  176 Ohio St. 61, 26 O.O. 2d 366, 197 N.E. 2d 548.  In the instant action, the trier of fact  does not  find the statements offered by plaintiff to be particularly persuasive.  {¶ 5} R.C. 5120.133 governs the transmission of funds from an inmate account to  satisfy court-ordered payment of court costs.  Ohio Adm. Code 5120-5-03 provides the  mechanism for the collection of court-ordered costs from inmates.  The court of claims  lacks jurisdiction to order defendant to refrain from following the mandates promulgated  by another court. See Abdussatar v. Mansfield Corr. Inst.,  Ct. of Cl. No. 2007-09429- AD, 2008-Ohio-3419, State v. Brown, 156 Ohio App. 3d 120, 2004-Ohio-558.  {¶ 6} Liability on the part of defendant has been established.  Defendant is liable  to plaintiff in the amount of $92.72.   

- 2 -

    Court of Claims of Ohio  The Ohio Judicial Center   65 South Front Street, Third Floor  Columbus, OH 43215  614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263  www.cco.state.oh.us        PERCY HUTTON              Plaintiff              v.    OHIO STATE PENITENTIARY              Defendant          Case No. 2010-10670-AD    Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert    ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE  DETERMINATION      Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth  in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor  of plaintiff in the amount of $92.72.  Court costs are assessed against defendant.                                                                                                            DANIEL  R.  BORCHERT          Deputy  Clerk    Entry cc:    Percy Hutton, #195-620    Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel  878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road    Department of Rehabilitation  Youngstown, Ohio  44505    and Correction              770  West  Broad  Street          Columbus,  Ohio    43222        SJM/laa   

- 3 -

  4/7  Filed 4/25/11  Sent to S.C. reporter 8/5/11       

- 4 -



Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company