Brunner v. N. Central Corr. Inst., (Ohio 2007)
Linked as:
Summary
Inmate property loss, internal transfer. No authority to destroy inmate’s property. Burden of proof, duty of care. Judgment for plaintiff.
Summary
Inmate property loss, internal transfer. No authority to destroy inmate’s property. Burden of proof, duty of care. Judgment for plaintiff.
Text
[Cite as Brunner v. N. Central Corr. Inst., 2007-Ohio-6386.]
Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
ERIC BRUNNER Case No. 2006-08020-AD
Plaintiff Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert
v.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NORTH CENTRAL CORR. INST.
Defendant
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) On or about July 29, 2006, plaintiff, Eric Brunner, an inmate incarcerated at defendant, North Central Correctional Institution ("NCCI"), was transferred from the institution's general population to a segregation unit.
2) Plaintiff's personal property was inventoried, packed, and delivered into the custody of NCCI staff incident to his transfer.
3) Plaintiff asserted that when he was released from segregation and he regained possession of his property, he discovered multiple items of clothing were missing from his returned property. Plaintiff claimed the fol owing items were missing: two t-shirts, two shirts, two pairs of sweat pants, one sweat shirt, two thermal underwear tops, one hat, three pairs of socks, two pairs of undershorts, one pair of shower shoes, one pair of boots, one pair of thermal underwear bottoms, one blanket, and one adapter. Plaintiff recal ed he was told his clothing had been confiscated and declared contraband. Plaintiff related he was issued a conduct report for possession of contraband. Plaintiff maintained the confiscated property items were subsequently destroyed without any authorization.
4) Plaintiff alleged his property was improperly destroyed.
Consequently, plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover $180.30, the estimated
- 1 -
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 2 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 2 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
replacement value of his property claimed. Payment of the filing fee was waived.
5) Defendant acknowledged the fol owing property items were confiscated from plaintiff's possession: two shirts, two t-shirts, two pairs of sweat pants, two thermal underwear tops, one hat, one adapter, three pairs of socks, two pairs of undershorts, one pair of shower shoes, one pair of boots, one pair of thermal underwear bottoms, and two blankets, one blue, one yel ow. The confiscated property was classified as contraband and plaintiff was issued a conduct report for possession of contraband. The property items were declared contraband due to the fact the items would not fit in plaintiff's locker box and therefore, exceeded defendant's internal regulations regarding space limitations for inmate property possession. Defendant recorded plaintiff was given the opportunity to mail the declared contraband out of the institution. However, plaintiff did not have sufficient funds in his inmate account to cover postage costs. Therefore, the property items were destroyed by NCCI personnel.
Defendant contended plaintiff agreed to and authorized the destruction of the declared contraband. Defendant did not offer any documentation to establish plaintiff agreed to or authorized the destruction of the declared contraband articles.
6) Plaintiff filed a response insisting he never agreed to the destruction of his confiscated property. Plaintiff asserted NCCI employee, Sgt. Wilson, destroyed
- 2 -
se No. 2006-03532-AD - 3 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 3 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
his property without any authorization, acting on her own volition. Plaintiff noted he never signed any paperwork authorizing either the mailing or the destruction of the confiscated property. The file is devoid of any authorization document bearing plaintiff's signature.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1) Defendant argued the items confiscated from plaintiff were destroyed in accordance with the provisions of the Ohio Administrative Code, section 5120-9- 55(C).
Ohio Adm. Code 5120-9-55(C) provides:
"(C) Disposition of contraband: any items considered contraband under this rule may be confiscated.
"(1) Minor contraband.
"(a) When appropriate, such items should be returned to their proper locations or to their original owners. However, if the item came into the inmate's possession through a violation of the rules by the original owner, such item may not be returned to the owner, if the original owner is an inmate.
"(b) Minor contraband received in the mail may be returned to the sender if the inmate agrees to pay postage costs.
- 3 -
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 4 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 4 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
"(c) Minor contraband, valued at one hundred dollars or less, may be destroyed, donated, or utilized by the institution for training or other official purposes by the order of the warden when the institution has attempted to contact or identify the owner of the personal property and those attempts have been unsuccessful or the inmate who owns the personal property agrees in writing to the disposal of the property in question. (Emphasis added.)
"(d) Minor contraband, valued at over one hundred dollars, may not be returned to the original owner if either an inmate or unknown and may not be returned to sender, may be destroyed or utilized by the institution for training or other official purposes upon the issuance of an order of forfeiture by the court of common pleas in the county in which the institution is located. The warden may file a petition for forfeiture with the court, asking the order be issued. The petition shal attach a list of the property involved and shall state briefly why the property cannot be returned." (Emphasis added.)
2) It has been previous held, an inmate plaintiff may recover the value of confiscated property destroyed by agents of defendant when those agents acted without authority or right to carry out the property destruction. Berg v. Belmont Correctional Institution (1998), 97-09261-AD; Wooden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,
- 4 -
se No. 2006-03532-AD - 5 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 5 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Ct. of Cl. No. 2004-01958-AD, 2004-Ohio-4820; Hemsley v. N. Cent. Correctional Inst., Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-03946-AD, 2005-Ohio-4613; Mayfield v. Richland Correctional Inst., Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-07976-AD, 2006-Ohio-358.
3) The credibility of witnesses and the weight attributable to their testimony are primarily matters for the trier of fact. State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 230, paragraph one of the syl abus. The court is free to believe or disbelieve, all or any part of each witness's testimony. State v. Antil (1964), 176 Ohio St. 61. The trier of fact does not find defendant's assertions particularly persuasive in respect to plaintiff authorizing the disposition of his confiscated property items.
4) Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to the loss of plaintiff's property claimed. Baisden v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1977), 76-0617-AD; Stewart v. Ohio National Guard (1979), 78-0342-AD. Defendant is liable to plaintiff for the damage amount claimed.
- 5 -
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 6 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 6 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
ERIC BRUNNER Case No. 2006-08020-AD
Plaintiff Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert
v.
ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE
DETERMINATION NORTH CENTRAL CORR. INST.
Defendant
Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
- 6 -
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 7 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
Case No. 2006-03532-AD - 7 - MEMORANDUM DECISION
of plaintiff in the amount of $180.30. Court costs are assessed against defendant.
DANIEL R.
BORCHERT
Deputy Clerk
Entry cc: Eric Brunner, #A322-857
Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 670 Marion-Williamsport Road E.
Department of Rehabilitation Marion, Ohio 43301-1812
and Correction
1050 Freeway Drive North
Columbus, Ohio
43229
RDK/laa 8/17 Filed 9/11/07 Sent to S.C. Reporter 11/29/
- 7 -
Sponsored links
